<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-01-09&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt; A limitation on most existing micropayment channel ideas is that payments&#xA;&gt; can only flow in one direction.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;It&#39;s worth noting that the original protocol as designed by Satoshi did not&#xA;have this limitation. It has evolved this way because of ad-hoc DoS fixes&#xA;over time (btw I&#39;m not saying they were the wrong thing to do, as non &#34;ad&#xA;hoc&#34; solutions are significantly more work). But it seems like eventually a&#xA;different approach to handling DoS attacks based on resource prioritisation&#xA;and scheduling will become needed / implemented, and at that point the&#xA;original design could be safely brought back to life.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150109/dee4f22b/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>