<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1k9ajtzw275c34txkcf3frjrvgez6rjvhlqqvh6uwmjucekafds0q5kwv59</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1k9ajtzw275c34txkcf3frjrvgez6rjvhlqqvh6uwmjucekafds0q5kwv59</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-20&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt; The average person is not going to be confident that the prefix they&#xA;&gt; are using is the correct one, &#xA;&#xA;The use of any &#39;prefix&#39; is one of choice and entirely unnecessary, and there&#xA;are already established &#39;divisions&#39; in u/mBTC for those that feel they need&#xA;to use such things.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; people WILL send 1000x more or less than&#xA;&gt; intended if we go down this road, &#xA;&#xA;Exceptionally unlikely - I deal every day with currencies with 0, 2 and 3&#xA;dp&#39;s in amount ranging from &#39;under 1 whole unit&#39; to tens of thousands - Not&#xA;once in 20 years has anyone ever &#39;sent&#39; more or less than intended - oh,&#xA;they&#39;ve &#39;intended&#39; to underpay just fine, but never *unintended*.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I propose that users are offered a preference to denominate the&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin currency in a unit called a bit. Where one bitcoin (BTC)&#xA;&gt; equals one million bits (bits) and one bit equals 100 satoshis.&#xA;&#xA;I propose that for people unable to understand what a bitcoin is, they can&#xA;just use satoshi&#39;s and drop this entire proposal.&#xA;&#xA;Rob</html></oembed>