rich1.0npub16ycdmhx5sct3h37cwvjff8le7qlp9k0ngst5ry5n262j6gkesrssskjvwyhttps://nostr.ae/npub16ycdmhx5sct3h37cwvjff8le7qlp9k0ngst5ry5n262j6gkesrssskjvwynjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2018-01-16 📝 Original message: It isn't obvious to me from the BOLTs if fees can be negative, and I'm finding uint in the go source code - which suggests not. In scenarios where the funding of a payment channel has been fully committed in one direction, why not allow negative fees to incent unwinding, in scenarios where nodes consider that cheaper than on-chain rebalancing? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180116/e91b10db/attachment.html>