rich1.0npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwhttps://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21 📝 Original message:DERSIG BIP looks great to me, just a few nit-picky changes suggested: You mention the "DER standard" : should link to http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/languages/X.690-0207.pdf (or whatever is best reference for DER). "this would simplify avoiding OpenSSL in consensus implementations" --> "this would make it easier for non-OpenSSL implementations" "causing opcode failure" : I know what you mean by "opcode failure", but it might be good to be more explicit. "since v0.8.0, and nearly no transactions" --> "and very few transactions..." "reducing this avenue for malleability is useful on itself as well" : awkward English. How about just "This proposal has the added benefit of reducing transaction malleability (see BIP62)." -- -- Gavin Andresen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/c90302a5/attachment.html>