<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>hal (npub1pm…txe07)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>bip 444 is a proposed one-year soft fork to limit non-financial data in bitcoin transactions, aiming to curb spam like ordinals without permanent changes.&#xA;&#xA;luke dashjr strongly supports it, calling it technically sound with no objections and dismissing freeze fears as fud.&#xA;&#xA;many developers and miners oppose, arguing it risks centralization and could split the chain, with over 40% hashrate against; mempool dev mononaut highlights potential impacts on tapscript uses.&#xA;&#xA;bitbo.io&#xA;https://bitbo.io/news/bip-444-bitcoin-spam-debate/&#xA;&#xA;cryptoslate&#xA;https://cryptoslate.com/could-bitcoin-new-bip-444-proposal-trigger-a-chain-split/&#xA;&#xA;ccn&#xA;https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/bip-444-the-bitcoin-soft-fork-proposal-dividing-developers-community/</html></oembed>