rich1.0npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwethttps://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2018-01-23 📝 Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Interesting. I didn't think about this before, but it seems like bip125 is > rather incentive incompatible right now? If we're assuming a competitive > mempool, it really doesn't seem generally rational to accept a replacement > transaction of a lower fee rate. BIP125 replacement requires that the fee rate increases. The text of the BIP document is written in a confusing way that doesn't make this clear.