<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:04:03 PM Pavol Rusnak wrote:&#xA;&gt; On 04/23/2014 10:01 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; Yes, it should scan all possible (under the BIP-defined structure)&#xA;&gt; &gt; branches regardless of which features it supports.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; So you suggest to scan for accounts, show balances but don&#39;t allow user&#xA;&gt; to spend them? Does not seem right to me.&#xA;&#xA;Scan all branches for UTXOs, then you have the balance for the wallet. Account &#xA;balances are metadata, so cannot be known from the seed alone. If you want to &#xA;have a way to restore accounts, you must define some more detailed wallet file &#xA;format (which could be built on top of this).&#xA;&#xA;On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:04:35 PM you wrote:&#xA;&gt; On 23.04.2014, at 22:02, Luke-Jr &lt;luke at dashjr.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:01:16 PM Tamas Blummer wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt;&gt; The wallet has to know how it got the UTXO in order to be able to spend&#xA;&gt; &gt;&gt; it.&#xA;&gt; &gt; &#xA;&gt; &gt; No it doesn&#39;t... Just the assigned scriptPubKey and secret(s) required to&#xA;&gt; &gt; satisfy it.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; To know the secret it needs to know which key coordinate to use that is&#xA;&gt; logically the same as knowing the address it used to receive it.&#xA;&#xA;Sure, it *knows* what address was used to receive it. But at the point it&#39;s a &#xA;UTXO, that address is no longer relevant.&#xA;&#xA;Luke</html></oembed>