<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2016-06-21&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense for &#xA;&gt; people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networked &#xA;&gt; users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I&#39;m wrong, but IIRC &#xA;&gt; Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encouraged if &#xA;&#xA;How else would you have keybase accomplish what they&#39;re accomplishing, with the&#xA;same security model?&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 455 bytes&#xA;Desc: Digital signature&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160621/ec2235c8/attachment-0001.sig&gt;</html></oembed>