<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-06-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:30:21 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:&#xA;&gt; * Very real possibility of an overall net reduction of full nodes on P2P&#xA;&gt; network&#xA;&#xA;Even a reduction of *nodes at all*, as I&#39;ve never seen a listening bitcoinj or &#xA;MultiBit node. :/&#xA;&#xA;Jim, will MultiBit be adding p2p listening support?&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I&#39;m sure others can come up with a few more.&#xA;&#xA;Possibly against: Does MultiBit still promote Bitcoin misunderstandings with &#xA;misinformation like &#34;from&#34; addresses? (my apologies if I am remembering a &#xA;different client)</html></oembed>