<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-15&#xA;📝 Original message:Hello,&#xA;&#xA;As promised, we have released Bitcoin XT 0.11A which includes the bigger&#xA;blocks patch set. You can get it from&#xA;&#xA;     https://bitcoinxt.software/&#xA;&#xA;I feel sad that it&#39;s come to this, but there is no other way. The Bitcoin&#xA;Core project has drifted so far from the principles myself and many others&#xA;feel are important, that a fork is the only way to fix things.&#xA;&#xA;Forking is a natural thing in the open source community, Bitcoin is not the&#xA;first and won&#39;t be the last project to go through this. Often in forks,&#xA;people say there was insufficient communication. So to ensure everything is&#xA;crystal clear I&#39;ve written a blog post and a kind of &#34;manifesto&#34; to&#xA;describe why this is happening and how XT plans to be different from Core&#xA;(assuming adoption, of course).&#xA;&#xA;The article is here:&#xA;&#xA;    https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1&#xA;&#xA;It makes no attempt to be neutral: this explains things from our point of&#xA;view.&#xA;&#xA;The manifesto is on the website.&#xA;&#xA;I say to all developers on this list: if you also feel that Core is no&#xA;longer serving the interests of Bitcoin users, come join us. We don&#39;t bite.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150815/ce48d631/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>