<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-29&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA1&#xA;&#xA;On 04/29/2014 02:13 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:&#xA;&gt; I do think we need to move beyond this idea of Bitcoin being some&#xA;&gt; kind of elegant embodiment of natural mathematical law. It just&#xA;&gt; ain&#39;t so.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&#xA;I think everybody understands that Bitcoin has a positive net present&#xA;value exactly because it, unlike every other digital currency which&#xA;came before, does not include a feature that allows for balances to be&#xA;confiscated. Implementing any such feature, to any degree at all,&#xA;would render Bitcoin completely valueless.&#xA;&#xA;There are two possibilities here:&#xA;&#xA;If you understand this, then your proposal is a malicious attempt to&#xA;undermine Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;If you don&#39;t understand this then you suffer from a very serious case&#xA;of economic illiteracy, a case so bad that your continued&#xA;participation in Bitcoin represents a clear and present danger to all&#xA;Bitcoin users. If you can&#39;t even get the easy questions right, then&#xA;god help us all if you&#39;re ever faced with a difficult one.&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t have enough evidence to distinguish between the incompetence&#xA;hypothesis and the malice hypothesis, but it doesn&#39;t matter.&#xA;Regardless of your abilities or motives your proposal is unacceptable.&#xA;If you want a currency where miners can vote to steal from other&#xA;miners then implement it in Hearncoin and leave Bitcoin alone.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;- -- &#xA;Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.&#xA;Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)&#xA;Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTX/2dAAoJECoisBQbQ4v0jAoH/R1oNZ1tVp6DJ5BuPg0ZTav0&#xA;Dvzq8EfX/uRbRgmxotCHMwY6FJCoXqJTLyOnl2p670t7l5ZXqd91MdKKP2z7jYPY&#xA;GsVbqfGreF0dWKCd0mKTG5DM8pxndNWteGIsw9/sYvY/3p2Vopzp6N7fpl8TEf6p&#xA;2nyIzEqTD4aK5QkhM+sNnP1Cyh/l5AjJTES23GqSQIMG6vzLgqE8kyze+ANFVg1U&#xA;yka6bz4DX7DO7meyJyyOFaMJu6mgY+m6dSVaR7j/QmQMu22SwlSiPgqe6iO//os3&#xA;zcmwe/x4+5CmqJOO/PL5Or28iw/Qdf6vNePiaEIFtBzoKnHBhS2nAtL6jnOL928=&#xA;=4yIu&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: 0x1B438BF4.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-keys&#xA;Size: 21678 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140429/b00469ee/attachment.bin&gt;</html></oembed>