<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-10-21&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 8:44:53 AM Christian Decker wrote:&#xA;&gt; Hm, that is true as long as the signer is the only signer of the&#xA;&gt; transaction, otherwise he&#39;d be invalidating the signatures of the other&#xA;&gt; signers.&#xA;&#xA;Or he can just have the other signers re-sign with the modified version.&#xA;Even if it only worked with a single signer, it&#39;s still a form of malleability &#xA;that your BIP does not presently solve, but would be desirable to solve...&#xA;&#xA;Luke</html></oembed>