rich1.0npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0https://nostr.ae/npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2022-07-25 📝 Original message:even with zero block reward and minimal fees, large holders who perform zero transactions will still mine in order to preserve the value of the network this is not "mining your own tx", it is unrelated this is "mining at a small loss to preserve your stake" not only don't we need issuance or fees, but also the censorship resistance is not meaningfully improved with issuance On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Erik Aronesty <erik at q32.com> wrote: > >> subsidy to directly tie miner revenue to the total value of Bitcoin >> makes it not exactly how we want to incentivise a service that keeps >> >> > again, this is meaningless. if the fees aren't enough to keep bitcoin > secure for large transactions, then large holders are incentivised to mine > > that's it. > > it's not complicated > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220725/be53600c/attachment-0001.html>