<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-07-18&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; subsidy to directly tie miner revenue to the total value of Bitcoin&#xA;&gt; makes it not exactly how we want to incentivise a service that keeps&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;again, this is meaningless.   if the fees aren&#39;t enough to keep  bitcoin&#xA;secure for large transactions, then large holders are incentivised to mine&#xA;&#xA;that&#39;s it.&#xA;&#xA;it&#39;s not complicated&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220718/442c400a/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>