rich1.0npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2013-06-04 📝 Original message:On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Adam Back <adam at cypherspace.org> wrote: > d) some new standardized spend to fees (only miners can claim). > so if I understand what you proposed d) seems like a useful concept if that > is not currently possible. eg alternatively could we not just propose a > standard recognized address that clearly no-one knows the EC discrete log > of? I'm one of the people experimenting in this area. I've long argued that a zero-output transaction should be permitted -- 100% miner fee -- as an elegant proof of sacrifice. Unfortunately that requires a hard fork. Also, for most people, it seems likely that a change transaction would be generated. That, then, would generate an already-standard transaction, where inputs > outputs. -- Jeff Garzik Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/