rich1.0npub1nxlvf9mj3jzgue25n5d9y47s3h5hvg0ded9hwpejdxj9mtrs34vs97wjrvhttps://nostr.ae/npub1nxlvf9mj3jzgue25n5d9y47s3h5hvg0ded9hwpejdxj9mtrs34vs97wjrvnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2011-12-22 🗒️ Summary of this message: A proposal for a hierarchical network where miners/supernodes are tightly interconnected at the top and lightweight clients verify transactions at the bottom. 📝 Original message:On 2011 December 21 Wednesday, Christian Decker wrote: > Supernodes will be those nodes that verify all transactions and make them > available to miners. Since miners will become more and more specialized > these supernodes are likely to be owned by the miners themself. To be a > miner either you need to verify all the transactions you include (otherwise > others might be able to find an error in your block and thus drop it) or > have someone that verifies them for you. In the end I think we'll end up > with a hierarchical network, with the miners/supernodes tighly > interconnected at the top and the lightweight clients that simply verify > transactions (or their inputs to be precise) that are destined for them at > the bottom. A thought occurred to me. We already run a decentralised system, but it's done by making everyone duplicate all other work. There is no fundamental reason why all work needs to be duplicated though. What about this: every node randomly chooses whether to verify any particular transaction. If we assume the network is large and the random factor is correctly chosen, then we can still guarantee that every transaction is verified. Then, we simply add a protocol message that is a negative-announce transaction. That is to say, we give nodes a way of telling other nodes that they think a transaction is invalid. The other nodes are then free to verify _that_ assertion and forward the negative-announce. Miners can then listen for negative-announcements and use them to decide were to dedicate their verification efforts. They then don't need to verify all (or perhaps even any) transactions themselves and can dedicate their processing power to mining. (I've actually mentioned this idea before, but that time I was using it as a double-spend prevention method). Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins andyparkins at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111222/b2825251/attachment.sig>