<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] (npub1ms…pmwjy)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1msef5qkfwz4t7qacwxz775wgdtlytph78g2g2z903x90874u263sypmwjy</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12&#xA;📝 Original message:On 2/12/2015 6:25 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Miner will see a mixed picture and will struggle to act “honestly” on &#xA;&gt; a statistical measure.&#xA;&#xA;The statistics come from the aggregate actions of all nodes, especially &#xA;those miners who watch p2p transactions and assemble blocks.&#xA;&#xA;Any one node makes deterministic decisions based on its own observation &#xA;-- just like today&#39;s valid/invalid decision based on whether a blocktime &#xA;is within the next 2 hours or not.&#xA;&#xA;The idea is that miners will exclude respends because they put the block &#xA;at risk of being forked off, with no offsetting payback.  The design &#xA;point is to make sure this is sufficiently unlikely to happen &#xA;accidentally, or via some attack vector.</html></oembed>