rich1.0npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydhttps://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-01-16 📝 Original message:I think we have a winner in "reusable address". Yes an existing address can be reused and will superficially appear to work, it just won't work well. Calling them reusable addresses helps reinforce the idea in peoples mind that the other kind shouldn't be reused. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Drak <drak at zikula.org> wrote: > On 16 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman <jeremy at taplink.co> wrote: > >> Might I propose "reusable address". >> >> I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so >> encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'. >> > > The problem is all addresses are reusable and to an average user, > addresses are already reusable so there is little to distinguish the > address format. > It might be better to call it a "public address" in common terminology. > > Drak > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/1c7e3591/attachment.html>