rich1.0npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrshttps://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:35:50 PM Pavol Rusnak wrote: > On 04/23/2014 10:32 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > f) I missed the part where BIP 32 redefined "account" to mean "subwallet" > > instead of what has traditionally been called "account" in Bitcoin. > > Ah, okay. The last time I saw Bitcoin-qt it was still using independent > addresses. It is. Accounts have been a bitcoind feature since before 0.4. > > In that case, single-subwallet wallet software probably needs to have the > > user provide a subwallet number in addition to the seed. > > Which brings us back to my original complaint that the user can be > confused because he doesn't see all his funds. I don't see how. The user knows he has money in different subwallets. As long as he has a way to specify which subwallet he is accessing in single-subwallet clients, there shouldn't be a problem. Luke