<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-08-19&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Garzik &lt;jgarzik at bitpay.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not&#xA;&gt; on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is.&#xA;&#xA;Despite my complaining about github, I don&#39;t like the idea of moving&#xA;somewhere else. The current way of working - to use github for storing&#xA;the tree, and use a custom script for signing+merging - is fine with&#xA;me.&#xA;&#xA;Github has a low barrier to contribution. Almost every open source&#xA;developer already has a github account. Switching to something&#xA;self-hosted makes it more difficult for people to contribute.&#xA;&#xA;Plus if we have to take the hosting upon ourselves, we have to handle&#xA;sysadmin work ourselves as well. That&#39;s not a good use of the limited&#xA;manpower available.&#xA;&#xA;Also it will be a lot of work to migrate over all the current issues&#xA;and pulls. I don&#39;t look forward to that. I don&#39;t see the point of&#xA;this, sorry.&#xA;&#xA;Wladimir</html></oembed>