rich1.0npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-09-27 📝 Original message:On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:26:12PM -0400, jl2012 at xbt.hk wrote: > +1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree > with all Peter's points. Thanks! > By the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the > deployment of BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and > that's why we have 0.9.5. I certainly could, though there's good reasons to move to v0.10.x; I'd want to first hear from miners as to why they're still on v0.9.x -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000f8ed62397b82b10e56b9aea309fb18c37985d1405808c4f -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 650 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150927/c633be3b/attachment.sig>