<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub10f96gqrsu4qpygfgvuvzce47aavjvql703egfde0l2hua8dzpszs67ej47</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub10f96gqrsu4qpygfgvuvzce47aavjvql703egfde0l2hua8dzpszs67ej47</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-21&#xA;📝 Original message:Let me make a sacrilegious proposal: keep using the name &#34;bitcoin&#34;, and&#xA;shift the decimal point.&#xA;&#xA;There would be a short adaption period, where people will need to talk&#xA;about &#34;new bitcoins&#34; and &#34;old bitcoins&#34; in order to disambiguate them.&#xA;However, Bitcoin users are techies, so I don&#39;t think that the ambiguity&#xA;will be a big issue. I don&#39;t think lots of people will mistakenly send&#xA;1000 times more than the amount they intended.&#xA;&#xA;The name &#34;bitcoin&#34; has a huge advantage over any other proposal, because&#xA;it is already established. No marketing is needed.&#xA;&#xA;This kind of renaming has already taken place many times in history,&#xA;because the currency was debased. Bitcoin would be the first time it&#xA;happens in the other direction.</html></oembed>