<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Kruw (npub1pw…6en60)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1pww7030g95nv9ptfpgfu69jpfxj6pm33xxueztsupwekce45wx4sm6en60</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>You identified the weakest UX flow in the entire spec 🎯&#xA;&#xA;The only scenario where &#34;Solo transaction&#34; is the preferable path in the Four Horsemen workflow would be if the user needs an immediate payment, no batching, and bare minimum transaction fees. Using equal size outputs from taker coinjoins mitigates this.&#xA;&#xA;Payjoin is the next cheapest, fastest option, only consuming ~40% more on chain fees than a solo transaction.</html></oembed>