<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1e37c4mperqtl8nt6xchhmykfamsjjj2x8x3sd0wk96weuc5gn6kqpmgdms</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1e37c4mperqtl8nt6xchhmykfamsjjj2x8x3sd0wk96weuc5gn6kqpmgdms</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2011-12-16&#xA;🗒️ Summary of this message: Taaki questions the value of IBANs when Bitcoin addresses already have their own checksums, while the other person argues for compatibility with existing software solutions.&#xA;📝 Original message:On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 21:10, Amir Taaki &lt;zgenjix at yahoo.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; Especially when we already have bitcoin addresses with their own checksums-&#xA;&gt; what value do IBANs add?&#xA;&#xA;Well, I&#39;m not an expert like you, but one benefit would be to be&#xA;compatible with existing software solutions that are based on using&#xA;IBANs.&#xA;&#xA;H</html></oembed>