<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1798ncudyucap9jzzujjsgufx8tdykm8auzfledjcs6f6wf4ekqvq8lpmjt</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1798ncudyucap9jzzujjsgufx8tdykm8auzfledjcs6f6wf4ekqvq8lpmjt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12&#xA;📝 Original message:Den 12 feb 2015 13:49 skrev &#34;Mike Hearn&#34; &lt;mike at plan99.net&gt;:&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Are you not counting collateralized multisignature notaries? Its an&#xA;extended version of the Greenaddress.it model.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; It makes unconfirmed transactions useless in the classical Bitcoin model.&#xA;Obviously if you introduce a trusted third party you can fix things, but&#xA;then you&#39;re back to having the disadvantages of centralised trust.&#xA;&#xA;That trust you put in them is extremely limited, and temporary.&#xA;&#xA;First of all, the standard multisignature notary model applies like how I&#xA;originally described it in my blog post over a year ago.&#xA;&#xA;You can prove a doublespend instantly by showing two conflicting&#xA;transactions both signed by thar party. This pair can be distributed as a&#xA;proof of malice globally in seconds via a push messaging mechanism.&#xA;&#xA;After confirmation in the blockchain, you have standard Bitcoin transaction&#xA;security.&#xA;To profit, the notary would have to be sure the payout from agreeing on&#xA;collusion (or to perform the doublespend themselves) would pay out better&#xA;than acting honestly for a given amount of time info the future. This means&#xA;transactions for small sums are secure.&#xA;&#xA;To provide security for high value transactions, NRW adds a collateral&#xA;transaction that the notary stands for and signs in advance, and gives to&#xA;the seller. The key here is that it is constructed such that if the&#xA;original payment gets doublespent, then this collateral transaction to the&#xA;seller becomes spendable.&#xA;&#xA;So there is two outcomes - either the customer or the notary pays the&#xA;seller. The customer can&#39;t force a doublespend. The notary can&#39;t steal or&#xA;freeze funds (due to nlocktime fund recovery option). The seller knows&#xA;he&#39;ll get the funds for sure before delivering the goods. Nobody is at&#xA;risk.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/be689276/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>