<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub170s9de2ganthnna75443h70tnsn2lvmcq5365r0juk8nfa93lthqwjr45x</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub170s9de2ganthnna75443h70tnsn2lvmcq5365r0juk8nfa93lthqwjr45x</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-17&#xA;📝 Original message:On 15 August 2015 at 18:43, Satoshi Nakamoto via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of&#xA;&gt; relying solely on altruism.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Is he talking about &#34;full nodes&#34; i.e. validating-only, or nodes in the&#xA;sense of the original whitepaper (i.e. miners)? Because there is already&#xA;plenty of incentive for running a node (i.e. the coinbase).&#xA;&#xA;The issue is that the reward is more or less like a decentralised lottery&#xA;with high entry cost. If the income could be smoothed like in a mining&#xA;pool, without actually being a mining pool, then perhaps more people would&#xA;pay to enter the mining game. A bit like making P2Pool the one and only&#xA;pool allowed on the network.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150817/4c6230a0/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>