<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xz8q68hmzur6c6uje593nscy3q4njx05h4vnxmz2wxxptx7u7casl2925u</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xz8q68hmzur6c6uje593nscy3q4njx05h4vnxmz2wxxptx7u7casl2925u</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2012-11-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Walter Stanish &lt;walter at stani.sh&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; X-ISO4217-A3&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; I see that draft-stanish-x-iso4217-a3 is not standards track, is there&#xA;&gt;&gt; a reason for this?&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Of the three currently published proposals, all are essentially IANA&#xA;&gt; registry proposals.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; We are currently working with IETF staff, with open offers of support&#xA;&gt; from multiple well funded commercial bodies, to transition these&#xA;&gt; proposals through to IANA management.&#xA;&#xA;I hate to inform you that you have been mislead. The IETF and the IANA&#xA;do not operate as you outlined above. Having spent too many years&#xA;within ICANN/IETF/IANA I can assure you are mistaken.&#xA;Your drafts are expired and it appears that there is no support for a&#xA;&#34;finance&#34; working group in the IETF.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;-rick</html></oembed>