<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-11-27&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt; Since this attack vector has been discussed, I started making some&#xA;&gt; measurements on how effective it is to connect to Bitcoin using Tor,&#xA;&gt; and I found that the number of connections dropping to near-zero is&#xA;&gt; a situation which occurs rather frequently, which suggests that there&#xA;&gt; is still room to improve on the DoS handling.&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m confused by this, I run quite a few nodes exclusively on tor and&#xA;chart their connectivity and have seen no such connection dropping&#xA;behaviour.&#xA;&#xA;Can you tell me more about how you measured this?&#xA;&#xA;[As an aside I agree that there are lots of things to improve here,&#xA;but the fact that users can in theory be forced off of tor via DOS&#xA;attacks is not immediately concerning to me because its a conscious&#xA;choice users would make to abandon their privacy (and the behaviour of&#xA;the system here is known and intentional). There are other mechanisms&#xA;available for people to relay their transactions than connecting&#xA;directly to the bitcoin network; so their choice isn&#39;t just abandon&#xA;privacy or don&#39;t use bitcoin at all.]</html></oembed>