<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2011-12-12&#xA;🗒️ Summary of this message: FirstBits may attract a rush to acquire desirable addresses, HTTPS is not foolproof, and addresses are likely unavoidable.&#xA;📝 Original message:FirstBits looks nice at glance, but is bound to create a gold-rush to grab &#xA;every nice-looking FirstBits address.&#xA;&#xA;HTTPS is only as secure as the (centralized) CAs, thus not really any better &#xA;than TXT records.&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t think an address of some form is avoidable.</html></oembed>