<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-15&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; These are the people who used to run around saying that Bitcoin&#xA;&gt; development is &#34;decentralized&#34; because anyone can fork the code and now&#xA;&gt; many of the same people claim a fork will destroy everything.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;You may be misremembering; nobody has ever disagreed that you can fork a&#xA;source code repository. Perhaps you are thinking instead about the concerns&#xA;regarding &#34;asymmetric&#34; rule incompatibilities?&#xA;&#xA;- Bryan&#xA;http://heybryan.org/&#xA;1 512 203 0507&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150815/7385744d/attachment-0001.html&gt;</html></oembed>