<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10&#xA;📝 Original message:On Monday 10. August 2015 13.55.03 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; Gavin, I interpret the absence of response to these questions as a&#xA;&gt; sign that everybody agrees that  there&#39;s no other reason to increase&#xA;&gt; the consensus block size other than to avoid minimum market fees from&#xA;&gt; rising (above zero).&#xA;&gt; Feel free to correct that notion at any time by answering the&#xA;&gt; questions yourself.&#xA;&gt; In fact if any other &#34;big block size advocate&#34; thinks there&#39;s more&#xA;&gt; reason I would like to hear their reasons too.&#xA;&#xA;See my various emails in the last hour.&#xA;-- &#xA;Thomas Zander</html></oembed>