<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Salty Cracker (npub1rx…lqp96)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1rxak2es99eawktcvdx4kfzsu3ynntd8rmayz7jkprhslkj7ze3qs0lqp96</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Identifying the problem with the current system is not predicated upon having a solution with which to replace it. &#xA;Many theories have been proposed, with the one you laid out being one of the more popular ones. &#xA;In 1990, there was no market demand for an iPhone. In 2020 (just 30 years later), you have a different story. My point being: until a solution finds and/or is permitted to fix a problem, it would be a fool&#39;s errand to get into every nuance of what an alternative system would look like. This does not negate the original premise that it is immoral to lock somebody in a cage for DUI.  &#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>