rich1.0kysela_prdel (npub1lx…fml38)https://nostr.ae/npub1lx22azckyh2elpxqptjdld84uksyzu2w9vnf4gvwmsr4jr8sqxwq9fml38njumphttps://nostr.aeI’m almost on the BIP 110 side. The only thing that worries me is this: I’m concerned that after tightening the OP_RETURN rules and other anti-spam measures, spammers will start bloating the UTXO set instead. That would be a worse outcome for node operators, since the UTXO set consumes RAM rather than SSD/HDD storage. Yes, I’ve heard Bitcoin Mechanic argue that this is only a theoretical concern and may never actually happen. But Bitcoin is still the best chain with the brightest future, so the incentive for spammers is significant. What’s your take on this?