rich1.0npub10vt6y7m6shn8hfuj83zjlwcga4fky38kv73qz6xlcvtj4q7fjt0sqmper0https://nostr.ae/npub10vt6y7m6shn8hfuj83zjlwcga4fky38kv73qz6xlcvtj4q7fjt0sqmper0njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2011-12-13 🗒️ Summary of this message: A DNS-based protocol for server.com model is suggested to be used with Namecoin or other DNS replacements/enhancements. The CA model is deemed broken for Bitcoin. 📝 Original message:I like the user at server.com model. The protocol should be done entirely in DNS, though, not using HTTP connections to the server. Then the protocol can easily be used with Namecoin or other DNS replacements/enhancements later. Crypto to prevent MITM attacks can be an optional part of the protocol. Almost all users will be unable to set up *any* always-on Internet service to answer queries, so I'm not too concerned about how easy it is to set up the server software. I agree that FirstBits is bad for this. Unlike DNS, "registrations" last forever because private keys can't be transferred safely. All short names will be taken quickly. It will also be very expensive for clients to query this themselves. The CA model is broken and it should never be used by Bitcoin.