<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3l</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3l</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2018-11-02&#xA;📝 Original message:&#xA;Good morning Rusty, aj, and list,&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; &gt; -   channel announcements: do you support secp256k1 for hashes or just&#xA;&gt; &gt;     sha256?&#xA;&gt; &gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Worse, it becomes &#34;I support secp256k1 with ECDSA&#34; then a new &#34;I support&#xA;&gt; secp256k1 with Schnorr&#34;. You need a continuous path of channels with&#xA;&gt; the same feature.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I believe not?  Both the 2p-ECDSA and Schnorr contingent payment schemes effectively encode &#34;I will pay you N satoshi if you give me the private key of the public key P on the secp256k1 curve, before time B&#34;, which can be composed with another contingent payment of either 2p-ECDSA or Schnorr.  So it would be possible to have a route with channels alternating between the two schemes.&#xA;&#xA;Or do I misunderstand some detail?&#xA;&#xA;Regards,&#xA;ZmnSCPxj</html></oembed>