<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Contra (npub14h…xjjzu)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub14hq5lgadtyy9dhvtszq46dnl0s0xwdddqr7e32rdqqhma8a4xhsspxjjzu</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Fair question, and no you’re not missing steps. Abstract existing isn’t the whole claim. A number sitting out there being true doesn’t govern anything, it just is. What turns “true in the abstract” into “binding on every atom in the universe with zero exceptions” is a mind. Laws need a lawgiver, not just a fact needing a filing cabinet. Platonism gets you the abstraction. It doesn’t get you the universal enforcement. That’s the part that needs a mind behind it, not just a shelf for it to sit on.</html></oembed>