<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub10tqt6wdc2neye0cxwyphtre6n5uccgur94khtqjdry9wxhrvywlq6w9uu9</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub10tqt6wdc2neye0cxwyphtre6n5uccgur94khtqjdry9wxhrvywlq6w9uu9</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-05-22&#xA;📝 Original message:On May 22, 2017 3:13 PM, &#34;Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev&#34; &lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.&#xA;linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; In the future, when there is no block subsidy, a rich attacker can also do&#xA;&gt; that in mainchain Bitcoin.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t think they are the same.&#xA;&#xA;With Bitcoin, you only get to reverse recent transactions.  If you actually&#xA;reversed 2-3 weeks of transactions, then the Bitcoin price would fall,&#xA;destroying the value of the additional coins you managed to obtain.  Even&#xA;if their was no price fall, you can only get a fraction of the total.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I would replace &#34;Bitcoins you manage to steal&#34; with &#34;Bitcoins you manage to&#xA;double-spend&#34;. Then, it still seems the same to me.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;With BMM, you can &#34;buy&#34; the entire reserve of the sidechain by paying&#xA;(timeout) * (average tx fees).  If you destroy a side-chain&#39;s value, then&#xA;that doesn&#39;t affect the value of the bitcoins you manage to steal.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;It may destroy great value if it shakes confidence in the sidechain&#xA;infrastructure. Thus, the value of the stolen BTC may decrease, in addition&#xA;to the lost future tx fee revenues of the attacked chain.&#xA;&#xA;http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/drivechain/#drivechains-security&#xA;&#xA;In my view, sidechains should only exist at all if they positively impact&#xA;Bitcoin&#39;s value. It is therefore desirable for miners to steal from chains&#xA;that provide no value-add.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; In point of fact, the transactions *are* validated...by sidechain full&#xA;&gt; nodes, same as Bitcoin proper.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;The big difference is that Bitcoin holds no assets on another chain.  A&#xA;side-chain&#39;s value is directly linked to the fact that it has 100% reserves&#xA;on the Bitcoin main chain.  That can be targeted for theft.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;Again, I don&#39;t really think it is that different. One could interchange&#xA;&#34;recent txns&#34; (those which could be double-spent within 2-3 weeks) with&#xA;&#34;sidechain deposit tnxs&#34;.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170522/8a42bd04/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>