rich1.0npub1lf5jdpupmcelz945y09tzawew6pqs5wkkp6dppeujgxxnqltgufsmzuul6https://nostr.ae/npub1lf5jdpupmcelz945y09tzawew6pqs5wkkp6dppeujgxxnqltgufsmzuul6njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2016-10-02 📝 Original message:The purpose of this list is highly technical discussion, not political disagreements. Is this particular proposal encumbered by a licensing type, patent, or pending patent which would preclude it from being used in the bitcoin project? If not, you're wildly off topic. On Oct 2, 2016 12:11 PM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 02:00:01PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner wrote: > > Peter, are you really going to try to down vote a decent free and > > open-source proposal that benefits all the Bitcoin community including > > you and your future children because a personal attack to me without any > > logic or basis? > > I've suggested a way that you can rectify this situation so we can > continue to > collaborate: Have Rootstock adopt a legally binding patent pledge/license. > I'd > suggest you do as Blockstream has done and at minimum adopt the Defensive > Patent License (DPL); I personally will be doing so in the next week or > two for > my own consulting company (I'm discussing exactly how to do so with my > lawyer > right now). > > If Rootstock is not planning on getting any patents for offensive purposes, > then there is no issue with doing so - the DPL in particular is designed > in a > minimally intrusive way. > > Please fix this issue so we can in fact continue to collaborate to improve > Bitcoin. > > -- > https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/a23d4ab3/attachment.html>