<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub12r0yjt8723ey2r035qtklhmdj90f0j6an7xnan8005jl7z5gw80qat9qrx</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub12r0yjt8723ey2r035qtklhmdj90f0j6an7xnan8005jl7z5gw80qat9qrx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Why wouldn’t we? We would be able to double spend and get the exchanges to hold the bags. &#xA;&#xA;We would also be able to be buy back on different exchange and potentially be able to get new UTXOs that that are spendable on both chains and loop.&#xA;&#xA;If exchanges don’t have replay protection in place (mixing dust from spam chain after the soft fork) then they are vulnerable.&#xA;&#xA;If they add replay protection they have to pick a side, if they choose spam then they have wipe out risk which can stay dormant for weeks, months, years , or decades.</html></oembed>