<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-30&#xA;📝 Original message:I think we&#39;re going around in circles here so this will be my last message&#xA;on the thread unless someone comes up with something new.&#xA;&#xA;On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Gareth Williams &lt;gacrux at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; If Bitcoin works correctly nobody should have to care if they consider&#xA;&gt; themselves attackers, defenders, or little green men from Mars.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;One last time, I request that people read the white paper from 2008 before&#xA;making statements like this. If the notion of attacker was irrelevant to&#xA;Bitcoin, it would not be mentioned in the abstract, would it?&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140430/eabdcb7b/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>