rich1.0npub1gg0pysd236d4em7pts906ev9kf6f30j8werd40j2vwpes7fqdn4qtt7uvkhttps://nostr.ae/npub1gg0pysd236d4em7pts906ev9kf6f30j8werd40j2vwpes7fqdn4qtt7uvknjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2021-04-23 📝 Original message:ACK. p. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:09 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. > > Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be > fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression: > > > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves > > rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have > > rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development > > mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any > > unaddressed substantiated objections to it. > > A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is > unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we can > go > that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new > BIP > editors, so I think this should be fine. > > Please speak up soon if you disagree. > > Luke > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210423/0849a63a/attachment.html>