rich1.0npub1xg2m84malu0cfm4444r0kysx4rgk27e75aj6sz6538kw8fcz627qeadsv7https://nostr.ae/npub1xg2m84malu0cfm4444r0kysx4rgk27e75aj6sz6538kw8fcz627qeadsv7njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2012-01-31 📝 Original message:Generally I prefer BIP 21 over BIP 20. I'm neutral on the 'send' parameter - present in both BIPs - which I don't understand. I think a practical usecase should be given in the BIP. Also, the 'version' parameter is unclear. What does it mean? Is an oder defined on versions (1.0b > 1.0)? Why is it an ";" parameter rather than a normal "&" parameter? On 01/30/2012 12:55 AM, Amir Taaki wrote: > Matt Corallo posted a modification of BIP 20 in an earlier email and I > asked him if he wanted to become the champion of that BIP he submitted. > > It is a modification of BIP 20 sans the alternative non-decimal number > stuff. > > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021 > > Right now, I will ask the GUI client implementations like MultiBit or > Bitcoin-Qt, not different codebases like BitCoinJ or libbitcoin if they > support BIP 20 or BIP 21. Feel free to raise any objections. > > More weight will be given to GUIs with actual URI sche me > implementations and it's good to have a general consensus. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development