<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-05-29&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt; And looking at the version (aka user-agent) strings of publicly reachable&#xA;&gt; nodes on the network.&#xA;&gt; (e.g. see the count at  https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/ )&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Yeah, though FYI Luke informed me last week that I somehow managed to take&#xA;out the change to the user-agent string in Bitcoin XT, presumably I made a&#xA;mistake during a rebase of the rebranding change. So the actual number of&#xA;XT nodes is a bit higher than counting user-agent strings would suggest.&#xA;&#xA;I sort of neglected XT lately. If we go ahead with this then I&#39;ll fix&#xA;things like this.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150529/83bc21bf/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>