<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub16ecxq9xc02qz8vu442d3mhue6z0r7gmdhe2ls2yze9h7uu3wwncspr69ln</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub16ecxq9xc02qz8vu442d3mhue6z0r7gmdhe2ls2yze9h7uu3wwncspr69ln</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-04-08&#xA;📝 Original message:William,&#xA;&#xA;I believe the reasoning for this is stated in the Coin Type section.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Public derivation is used so that cosigners need only know one of each&#xA;other&#39;s public keys, rather than needing to distribute public keys for each&#xA;coin.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;BIP44 has a coin level, but it&#39;s a private derived level, so cosigners&#xA;would not be able to generate multiple crypto currencies of each others&#39;&#xA;without giving each other n xpubs where n is the number of currencies&#xA;shared. This new proposal basically sticks coin type on the public&#xA;derivation side of things so that I could generate litecoin or darkcoin&#xA;multisigs without your permission...&#xA;&#xA;Kefkius,&#xA;&#xA;This BIP seems like a good fit for multi-currency wallets based on&#xA;multisig. So kudos for putting it in writing.&#xA;&#xA;However, I don&#39;t know if this is really a BIP thing. It&#39;s not improving&#xA;Bitcoin (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal... remember?), in fact, by definition&#xA;it is improving altcoin usability.&#xA;&#xA;For that reason alone I will say I disagree for a BIP for this.&#xA;- Jona&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;2015-04-08 16:46 GMT+09:00 William Swanson &lt;swansontec at gmail.com&gt;:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; It&#39;s not really clear why this is better than BIP 44 as it already&#xA;&gt; stands. You have the same fields, but they are just in a different&#xA;&gt; order. Couldn&#39;t you just use the existing BIP 44 hierarchy, but add&#xA;&gt; the convention that &#34;wallet/account N&#34; is the same wallet in each&#xA;&gt; supported currency?&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; For example, if I have a wallet called &#34;business expenses&#34;, which&#xA;&gt; happens to be wallet m / 44&#39; / 0&#39; / 5&#39;, for Bitcoin, then the same&#xA;&gt; wallet would be m / 44&#39; / 3&#39; / 5&#39; for Dogecoin, and m / 44&#39; / 2&#39; / 5&#39;&#xA;&gt; for Litecoin.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I am trying to think of examples where your proposal is better than&#xA;&gt; BIP 44, but I can&#39;t think of any. Even backup recovery works fine. I&#xA;&gt; assume that your idea is to continue iterating over the different&#xA;&gt; wallet indices as long as you are finding funds in *any* currency.&#xA;&gt; Well, you can still do that with BIP 44. The fields are in a different&#xA;&gt; order, but that doesn&#39;t affect the algorithm in any way.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Maybe you have some deeper insight I&#39;m not seeing, but if so, you need&#xA;&gt; to clearly explain that in your motivation section. The current&#xA;&gt; explanation, &#34;This limits the possible implementations of&#xA;&gt; multi-currency, multisignature wallets,&#34; is pretty vauge. Also, there&#xA;&gt; is nothing in this spec that addresses the multisignature use-case.&#xA;&gt; The BIP 45 spec does a lot of extra work to make multisignature work&#xA;&gt; smoothly.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I&#39;m not trying to criticize your proposal. I&#39;m just trying to&#xA;&gt; understand what it&#39;s trying to accomplish.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; -William Swanson&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Kefkius &lt;kefkius at maza.club&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; I have a potential BIP, &#34;Multi-Currency Hierarchy For Use In&#xA;&gt; &gt; Multisignature Deterministic Wallets.&#34; I&#39;m requesting discussion on it,&#xA;&gt; &gt; and possibly assignment of a BIP number.&#xA;&gt; &gt;&#xA;&gt; &gt; It&#39;s located in this github gist:&#xA;&gt; &gt; https://gist.github.com/Kefkius/1aa02945e532f8739023&#xA;&gt; &gt;&#xA;&gt; &gt;&#xA;------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; &gt; BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT&#xA;&gt; &gt; Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard&#xA;&gt; &gt; Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live&#xA;exercises&#xA;&gt; &gt; http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-&#xA;event?utm_&#xA;&gt; &gt; source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=VA_SF&#xA;&gt; &gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; &gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; &gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; &gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT&#xA;&gt; Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard&#xA;&gt; Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live&#xA;exercises&#xA;&gt; http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-&#xA;event?utm_&#xA;&gt; source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=VA_SF&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;--&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----&#xA;Comment: http://openpgpjs.org&#xA;&#xA;xsBNBFTmJ8oBB/9rd+7XLxZG/x/KnhkVK2WBG8ySx91fs+qQfHIK1JrakSV3&#xA;x6x0cK3XLClASLLDomm7Od3Q/fMFzdwCEqj6z60T8wgKxsjWYSGL3mq8ucdv&#xA;iBjC3wGauk5dQKtT7tkCFyQQbX/uMsBM4ccGBICoDmIJlwJIj7fAZVqGxGOM&#xA;bO1RhYb4dbQA2qxYP7wSsHJ6/ZNAXyEphOj6blUzdqO0exAbCOZWWF+E/1SC&#xA;EuKO4RmL7Imdep7uc2Qze1UpJCZx7ASHl2IZ4UD0G3Qr3pI6/jvNlaqCTa3U&#xA;3/YeJwEubFsd0AVy0zs809RcKKgX3W1q+hVDTeWinem9RiOG/vT+Eec/ABEB&#xA;AAHNI2tpbm9zaGl0YSA8a2lub3NoaXRham9uYUBnbWFpbC5jb20+wsByBBAB&#xA;CAAmBQJU5ifRBgsJCAcDAgkQRB9iZ30dlisEFQgCCgMWAgECGwMCHgEAAC6Z&#xA;B/9otobf0ASHYdlUBeIPXdDopyjQhR2RiZGYaS0VZ5zzHYLDDMW6ZIYm5CjO&#xA;Fc09ETLGKFxH2RcCOK2dzwz+KRU4xqOrt/l5gyd50cFE1nOhUN9+/XaPgrou&#xA;WhyT9xLeGit7Xqhht93z2+VanTtJAG6lWbAZLIZAMGMuLX6sJDCO0GiO5zxa&#xA;02Q2D3kh5GL57A5+oVOna12JBRaIA5eBGKVCp3KToT/z48pxBe3WAmLo0zXr&#xA;hEgTSzssfb2zTwtB3Ogoedj+cU2bHJvJ8upS/jMr3TcdguySmxJlGpocVC/e&#xA;qxq12Njv+LiETOrD8atGmXCnA+nFNljBkz+l6ADl93jHzsBNBFTmJ9EBCACu&#xA;Qq9ZnP+aLU/Rt6clAfiHfTFBsJvLKsdIKeE6qHzsU1E7A7bGQKTtLEnhCCQE&#xA;W+OQP+sgbOWowIdH9PpwLJ3Op+NhvLlMxRvbT36LwCmBL0yD7bMqxxmmVj8n&#xA;vlMMRSe4wDSIG19Oy7701imnHZPm/pnPlneg/Meu/UffpcDWYBbAFX8nrXPY&#xA;vkVULcI/qTcCxW/+S9fwoXjQhWHaiJJ6y3cYOSitN31W9zgcMvLwLX3JgDxE&#xA;flkwq/M+ZkfCYnS3GAPEt8GkVKy2eHtCJuNkGFlCAmKMX0yWzHRAkqOMN5KP&#xA;LFbkKY2GQl13ztWp82QYJZpj5af6dmyUosurn6AZABEBAAHCwF8EGAEIABMF&#xA;AlTmJ9QJEEQfYmd9HZYrAhsMAABKbgf/Ulu5JAk4fXgH0DtkMmdkFiKEFdkW&#xA;0Wkw7Vhd5eZ4NzeP9kOkD01OGweT9hqzwhfT2CNXCGxh4UnvEM1ZMFypIKdq&#xA;0XpLLJMrDOQO021UjAa56vHZPAVmAM01z5VzHJ7ekjgwrgMLmVkm0jWKEKaO&#xA;n/MW7CyphG7QcZ6cJX2f6uJcekBlZRw9TNYRnojMjkutlOVhYJ3J78nc/k0p&#xA;kcgV63GB6D7wHRF4TVe4xIBqKpbBhhN+ISwFN1z+gx3lfyRMSmiTSrGdKEQe&#xA;XSIQKG8XZQZUDhLNkqPS+7EMV1g7+lOfT4GhLL68dUXDa1e9YxGH6zkpVECw&#xA;Spe3vsHZr6CqFg==&#xA;=/vUJ&#xA;-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150409/a0f5b1a6/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>