<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-07-15&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Jeff Garzik &lt;jgarzik at bitpay.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; Proxying another&#39;s idea, from CoinSummit.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; The request:   It would be useful to limit the lifetime of a bitcoin&#xA;&gt; address.  Intentionally prevent (somehow) bitcoins being sent to a&#xA;&gt; pubkey/pkh after the key expires.&#xA;&#xA;Payment request expiration was meant to address this.&#xA;&#xA;Adding an optional expiration timestamp to addresses would be&#xA;possible, however, it would be a non-backward-compatible change and&#xA;lots of software would have to be changed at this point.&#xA;&#xA;In my opinion encouraging the use of the payment protocol and&#xA;deprecating the use of addresses is the best way forward, and not just&#xA;for this reason.&#xA;&#xA;Wladimir</html></oembed>