<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-02-18&#xA;📝 Original message:&#xA;On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:08:59AM -0800, Jeremy Rubin wrote:&#xA;&gt; That&#39;s not really pinning; painning usually refers to pinning something to&#xA;&gt; the bottom of the mempool whereas these mechanisms make it easier to&#xA;&gt; guarantee that progress can be made on confirming the transactions you&#39;re&#xA;&gt; interested in.&#xA;&#xA;As I said, it&#39;s a new kind of pinning attack, distinct from other types of&#xA;pinning attack.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Often times in these protocols &#34;the call is coming inside the house&#34;. It&#39;s&#xA;&gt; not a third party adding fees we are scared of, it&#39;s a direct party to the&#xA;&gt; protocol!&#xA;&#xA;Often times that is true. But other times that is not true! I gave examples of&#xA;use-cases where being able to arbitrary add fees to transactions is harmful;&#xA;the onus is on you to argue why that is acceptable to burden those users with a&#xA;new class of attack.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Sponsors or fee accounts would enable you to ensure the protocol you&#39;re&#xA;&gt; working on makes forward progress. For things like Eltoo the internal&#xA;&gt; ratchet makes this work well.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; Protocols which depend on in mempool replacements before confirmation&#xA;&gt; already must be happy (should they be secure) with any prior state being&#xA;&gt; mined. If a third party pays the fee you might even be happier since the&#xA;&gt; execution wasn&#39;t on your dime.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Must be able to deal with&#34; is not the same thing as &#34;Must be happy&#34;. While&#xA;those use-cases do have to deal with those exceptional cases happening&#xA;occasionally, it&#39;s harmful if an attacker can harass you by making those&#xA;exceptional cases happen frequently.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 833 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20220218/ffb7a6b7/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>