<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Jameson Lopp (npub17u…wt4tp)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>I find the sociological aspects of BIP-110 to be far more interesting than the technical aspects. 110 supporters admit it&#39;s not a technical solution; the BIP itself admits it can&#39;t stop arbitrary data.&#xA;&#xA;But what&#39;s fascinating is the Bitcoin Puritans claim they are trying to fix &#34;Bitcoin Culture&#34; at the &#34;social layer&#34; by rejecting &#34;woke Core developers.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;What&#39;s amusing about this is I see little difference between puritans and the woke folk they detest. AFAICT the only distinction is which particular attributes each group uses to select people for cancellation.&#xA;&#xA;Fuck woke mobs.&#xA;Fuck puritan mobs.</html></oembed>