rich1.0npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-07-28 📝 Original message:That's not what I said. We don't seem able to communicate with each other efficiently, probably my fault since English is not my native language. But I don't want to use more of my time (or yours) in this discussion, since it's clearly unproductive. On Jul 28, 2015 6:45 PM, "Tom Harding" <tomh at thinlink.com> wrote: > Jorge, > > We obviously disagree fundamentally on the role of societal adoption, in > the system that Satoshi designed. > > Adoption is well ahead of Satoshi's schedule, and the measure of this is > the exchange rate. It is at once an imperfect measure, and one of the most > perfect markets that has ever existed. > > As long as hardware, electric power, and bandwidth are priced in fiat > currency, the exchange rate is a critical variable to security, capacity, > and other metrics of network health. > > It's not inconsistent that you consider the exchange rate irrelevant. In > fact it explains why you believe that Satoshi's timetable for transitioning > to fee incentives can be summarily tossed aside and replaced with something > you think is better. > > Here's an English saying I just invented. A bunch of geniuses can do a > lot more damage than one fool. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150728/c22de55e/attachment.html>