<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-11-02&#xA;📝 Original message:Guys, identity systems for the web are off-topic for this list. Other than&#xA;the anonymous passports/SINs/fidelity bond ideas, Bitcoin doesn&#39;t have any&#xA;relevance to it.&#xA;&#xA;On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Hannu Kotipalo &lt;hannu.kotipalo at iki.fi&gt;wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Maybe this is a bit off-topic, but the *real* answer to the question&#xA;&gt; &#34;why-is-nobody-using-ssl-client-certificates&#34; is that it would force&#xA;&gt; www pages to be encrypted and would make it a lot more difficult for&#xA;&gt; NSA to log www-trafic.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;No, it wouldn&#39;t. You can log a user in using SSL and then redirect the user&#xA;back to an encrypted page, using cookies for the rest of the session.&#xA;Please don&#39;t clutter up this list with conspiracy theories. The brutal&#xA;reality is that identity is a hard problem.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131102/c202bc05/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>