<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>john (npub1v7…utfk0)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1v7k63c6y2vktlqhsuupywt3yc7ykursujc34at964f9cv9s9y9csjutfk0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Accepting that is a true dichotomy, what I&#39;m saying is when people tell you who they are listen.  Certainly the police can shoot a guy in the head for threating non-lethal violence on another under appropriate circumstances.  If a group takes over a building under the banner of an admitted criminal enterprise funded by the same threat of violence, a banner of violence and declared unlawfulness, I&#39;m not sure that makes a difference.   In otherwords, I think the grayness isn&#39;t in the law as you describe it, the grayness is in the complexity of human interaction.</html></oembed>